Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 925 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2304 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Up to 59% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - €25.22 vs €60.9
- Up to 55% better value when playing Rust than Celeron G3900 - €0.17 vs €0.38 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 7% better in Rust than Phenom II X4 925 - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
149
93.71069182389937%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
44.73684210526316%
Price, €
€60.9
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Deneb | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |