Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1094 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 4% better in Lost Ark than Pentium G645T - 227 vs 219 FPS
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Up to 58% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - €25.66 vs €60.9
- Up to 56% better value when playing Lost Ark than Celeron G3900 - €0.12 vs €0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
219
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Processore Intel Pentium G645T Usato for Desktop 2-Core 2-Thread 2,5 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
