Key Differences
In short — Pentium G645T outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G645T is 326 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 11% cheaper than Pentium G645T - €22.88 vs €25.66
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 4 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74980 minutes ago
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74980 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
86.79706601466992%
Multi-Core
606
58.949416342412455%
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |