Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-4100 outperforms the more expensive Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-4100 is 326 days older than the more expensive Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Performs up to 1% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Pentium G645T - 105 vs 104 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Pentium G645T - €22.88 vs €25.66
- Up to 12% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Pentium G645T - €0.22 vs €0.25 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 4 vs 2 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10682 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
105
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10682 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |