Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 925 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 4327 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Up to 61% cheaper than Pentium Gold G6405 - €25.22 vs €64.98
- Up to 57% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Pentium Gold G6405 - €0.06 vs €0.14 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 5% better in DOOM Eternal than Phenom II X4 925 - 466 vs 445 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 58 vs 95 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
445
95.49356223175965%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
466
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
42.85714285714285%
Price, €
€64.98
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €64.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
37.735849056603776%
Multi-Core
930
52.84090909090909%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Deneb | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |