Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 925 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 4327 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €25.22 vs €73.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-10105F - €0.18 vs €0.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield 2042 than Phenom II X4 925 - 163 vs 141 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
141
86.50306748466258%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Buy for €73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
22.00825309491059%
Multi-Core
930
20.796064400715565%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
Deneb | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |