Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570 outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 925 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570 is 1117 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-3570 - €25.22 vs €79.61
- Up to 67% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-3570 - €0.23 vs €0.7 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Phenom II X4 925 - 113 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 77 vs 95 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
109
96.46017699115043%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
32.85714285714286%
Price, €
€79.61
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €79.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
48.78048780487805%
Multi-Core
930
48.33679833679834%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Deneb | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |