Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 925 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 1816 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Up to 65% cheaper than Celeron G1840 - €25.22 vs €72.66
- Up to 64% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1840 - €0.17 vs €0.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Phenom II X4 925 - 155 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 53 vs 95 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
152
98.06451612903226%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
155
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
36.17021276595745%
Price, €
€72.66
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Deneb | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |