Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 925 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3845 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Up to 68% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €25.22 vs €78.79
- Up to 67% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Athlon 3000G - €0.15 vs €0.46 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Phenom II X4 925 - 170 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
166
97.6470588235294%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
32.60869565217391%
Price, €
€78.79
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €78.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
33.437826541274816%
Multi-Core
930
47.08860759493671%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Athlon |
Deneb | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |