Buy on Amazon
€83.52
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2961 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Warcraft than FX-4100 - 169 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 73% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €22.88 vs €83.52
- Up to 69% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Athlon 3000G - €0.15 vs €0.49 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD Athlon 3000G Processore con grafica Radeon Vega 3 (2C/4T, orologio base da 3,5 GHz)
Buy for €83.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12120 minutes ago
Hegem AMD FX-Series FX4100 FX-4100 FX 4100 Processore CPU Quad-Core Quad-Thread da 3,6 GHz FD4100WMW4KGU Presa AM3+ Senza Ventola
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Athlon | Collection | FX |
| Picasso | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
