Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2634 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 5% better in Remnant II than Core i3-3240 - 83 vs 79 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 69% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €23.0 vs €74.44
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75693 minutes ago
Buy for €23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75692 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
57.88923719958202%
Multi-Core
1137
57.56962025316456%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |