Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3412 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 26% better in F1 23 than Core i5-760 - 186 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 70% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €22.37 vs €74.44
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75691 minutes ago
Buy for €22.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75690 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Lynnfield |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |