Buy on Amazon
€80.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2171 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-8300 - 233 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3,3 GHz a otto core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W Pacchetto di massa FX-8300 SENZA VENTOLA
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
