Key Differences
In short — FX-4130 outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4130 is 57 days older than FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74320 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |