Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1590 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than FX-4130 - 169 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 51 vs 125 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74334 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |