Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 848 days newer than Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than Ryzen 5 1600 - 222 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 65 vs 155 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
221
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rome | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |