Buy on Amazon
€71
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Pentium Gold G6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 267 days older than Pentium Gold G6400.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Pentium Gold G6400 - 181 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 58 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Pentium Gold G6400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
175
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium Gold G6400 processor 4 GHz 4 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10950 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Pentium Gold G6400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| EPYC | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 155 W | TDP | 58 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
