Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Pentium Gold G6405 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 587 days older than Pentium Gold G6405.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 5% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Pentium Gold G6405 - 122 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 58 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
116
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
155 W | TDP | 58 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |