Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 1914 days newer than Core i5-4460.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Core i5-4460 - 182 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 84 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
181
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 84 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |