Buy on Amazon
€93
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $97
Availability
MSRP in USD: $97
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 902 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than EPYC 7302P - 239 vs 231 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 58 vs 155 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€93
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i3-12100F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop cache 12M, fino a 4,30 GHz
Buy for €93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 58 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
