Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 638 days newer than Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Pentium G4620 - 542 vs 479 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 24 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
542
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.65/FPS
100%
Price, £
£351.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £351.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40374 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
59.41915227629513%
Multi-Core
1599
21.45156962704588%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |