Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3312 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Fortnite than Core i7-860 - 224 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £270.91 vs £351.64
- Up to 18% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £1.28 vs £1.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
224
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.57/FPS
81.52866242038216%
Price, £
£351.64
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for £351.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32677 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
212
94.64285714285714%
Value, £/FPS
£1.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£270.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £270.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32676 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Lynnfield |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |