Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700F is 202 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 9% better in HITMAN 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 149 vs 137 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £328.66 vs £351.64
- Up to 32% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £1.74 vs £2.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
137
91.94630872483222%
Value, £/FPS
£2.57/FPS
67.70428015564202%
Price, £
£351.64
93%
Buy for £351.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
149
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.74/FPS
100%
Price, £
£328.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £328.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |