Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 219 days newer than Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Pentium G4620 - 128 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 24 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£409.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £409.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40407 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
64.48040885860307%
Multi-Core
1599
22.92144495412844%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |