Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 516 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - £315.0 vs £379.99
- Up to 12% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i7-9700KF - £3.18 vs £3.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 105 vs 99 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
99
94%
Value, £/FPS
£3.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£315
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18455 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
105
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.62/FPS
87%
Price, £
£379.99
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for £379.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18455 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |