Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 516 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - £315.0 vs £328.88
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 18% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 112 vs 95 FPS
- Up to 11% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £2.94 vs £3.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18057 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.94/FPS
100%
Price, £
£328.88
95%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £328.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18057 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |