Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700 is 621 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 7% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 110 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £248.88 vs £315.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £2.26 vs £3.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18314 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
110
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£248.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £248.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18314 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |