Buy on Amazon
£315
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-11700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-11700K is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11700K - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700K
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 147 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £237.7 vs £315.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £1.62 vs £2.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Processor - (12 Core/24 Threads) - YD192XA8AEWOF
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18592 minutes ago
Core i7-11700K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
147
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.62/FPS
100%
Price, £
£237.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-11700K (3.6 GHz, 16M Cache, up to 5.00 GHz)
Buy for £237.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18591 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i7-11700K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-11700K |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
