Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 2238 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 26% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 305 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - £163.79 vs £512.32
- Up to 60% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-14900KF - £0.68 vs £1.68 per FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
305
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.68/FPS
40%
Price, £
£512.32
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for £512.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
242
79%
Value, £/FPS
£0.68/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £163.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |