Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 2203 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 42% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-8400 - 785 vs 552 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - £156.85 vs £405.6
- Up to 46% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-14900KF - £0.28 vs £0.52 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
785
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.52/FPS
53.846153846153854%
Price, £
£405.6
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for £405.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50725 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
552
70.31847133757961%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£156.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £156.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50726 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1353
43.53281853281853%
Multi-Core
4748
22.56439501948484%
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |