Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-13700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-13700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 286 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-13700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i7-13700 - 260 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700 - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - £402.36 vs £512.32
- Up to 17% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i9-14900KF - £1.64 vs £1.97 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
260
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.97/FPS
83%
Price, £
£512.32
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for £512.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
245
94%
Value, £/FPS
£1.64/FPS
100%
Price, £
£402.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £402.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |