Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1526 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 132 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - £163.75 vs £323.97
- Up to 45% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-12900KF - £1.35 vs £2.45 per FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.45/FPS
55%
Price, £
£323.97
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for £323.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13255 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
121
91%
Value, £/FPS
£1.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |