Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2317 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Death Stranding than Core i5-6600K - 243 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - £106.66 vs £278.81
- Up to 59% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-12900KF - £0.47 vs £1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 91 vs 125 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
243
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.15/FPS
40%
Price, £
£278.81
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for £278.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10972 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
226
93%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£106.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £106.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10973 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |