Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron G3930 - 174 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £44.99 vs £399.99
- Up to 88% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i9-10900F - £0.27 vs £2.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
174
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.3/FPS
11.739130434782611%
Price, £
£399.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for £399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
164
94.25287356321839%
Value, £/FPS
£0.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£44.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
36.27684964200477%
Multi-Core
1043
12.378352717778306%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |