Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £49.99 vs £451.82
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 31% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G3930 - 492 vs 377 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75428 minutes ago
Buy for £451.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75428 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
20.443846671149966%
Multi-Core
1043
5.176692475679968%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |