Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - £29.99 vs £200.04
- Up to 85% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-14400F - £0.16 vs £1.04 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Celeron G3930 - 193 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
189
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
193
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.04/FPS
15%
Price, £
£200.04
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for £200.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |