Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - £29.99 vs £164.25
- Up to 80% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-13400F - £0.13 vs £0.65 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G3930 - 254 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
231
90%
Value, £/FPS
£0.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
254
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.65/FPS
20%
Price, £
£164.25
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for £164.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |