Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 363 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - £49.99 vs £165.86
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 14% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G3930 - 115 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74379 minutes ago
Buy for £165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74379 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
40.18506278916061%
Multi-Core
1043
17.66299745977985%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |