Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930 outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1302 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Valorant than FX-9370 - 697 vs 689 FPS
- Up to 82% cheaper than FX-9370 - £29.99 vs £169.97
- Up to 84% better value when playing Valorant than FX-9370 - £0.04 vs £0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 51 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
697
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
Buy for £169.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |