Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £248.65 vs £513.33
- Up to 35% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Core i9-14900F - £1.91 vs £2.92 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 35% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Core i9-10900F - 176 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
130
73%
Value, £/FPS
£1.91/FPS
100%
Price, £
£248.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £248.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
176
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.92/FPS
65%
Price, £
£513.33
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for £513.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |