Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 807 vs 761 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £325.0 vs £437.44
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74421 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
761
94.2998760842627%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£437.44
74%
Buy for £437.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74421 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
76.0143198090692%
Multi-Core
7454
88.46427723712318%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |