Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 185 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £248.65 vs £599.99
- Up to 59% better value when playing Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £1.34 vs £3.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.34/FPS
100%
Price, £
£248.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £248.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Buy for £599.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |