Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1039 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-7900X - 138 vs 135 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - £253.11 vs £428.88
- Up to 42% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-7900X - £1.83 vs £3.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 65 vs 140 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.83/FPS
100%
Price, £
£253.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £253.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Buy for £428.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |