Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1919 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 21% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-7900X - 211 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - £346.89 vs £428.88
- Up to 33% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-7900X - £1.64 vs £2.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7900X - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £428.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8574 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
211
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.64/FPS
100%
Price, £
£346.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £346.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8574 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7900X | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |