Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-7900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1107 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Up to 14% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - £428.88 vs £499.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Ryzen 9 3900XT - £3.54 vs £3.81 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 8% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Core i9-7900X - 131 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7900X - 24 vs 20 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
121
92%
Value, £/FPS
£3.54/FPS
100%
Price, £
£428.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £428.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15359 minutes ago
Buy for £499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15359 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |