Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-13700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-13700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 468 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-13700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £346.89 vs £525.79
- Up to 33% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-14900F - £2.57 vs £3.84 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-13700K - 137 vs 135 FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
135
98%
Value, £/FPS
£2.57/FPS
100%
Price, £
£346.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £346.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17745 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
137
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.84/FPS
66%
Price, £
£525.79
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for £525.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17745 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |