Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 705 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 7% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i9-10900F - 338 vs 316 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £303.66 vs £399.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for £399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
338
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.9/FPS
100%
Price, £
£303.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £303.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
62.25854383358098%
Multi-Core
8426
51.938605683289154%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |