Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 1918 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - £44.99 vs £303.66
- Up to 83% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-12900KS - £0.18 vs £1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 51 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 11% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron G3930 - 279 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 24 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
251
89.96415770609319%
Value, £/FPS
£0.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£44.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
279
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.09/FPS
16.513761467889907%
Price, £
£303.66
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for £303.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
22.58543833580981%
Multi-Core
1043
6.42914380817358%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |