Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 294 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - £66.48 vs £228.88
- Up to 70% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-11900KF - £0.3 vs £1.01 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G6900 - 227 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
219
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£66.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £66.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
227
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.01/FPS
29%
Price, £
£228.88
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for £228.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |