Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 614 days older than Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G6900 - 429 vs 424 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £242.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
94.29411764705883%
Multi-Core
2696
33.35395274031919%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |