Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700K is 294 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-11700K - £67.09 vs £225.84
- Up to 69% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-11700K - £0.32 vs £1.04 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700K
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G6900 - 218 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
208
95%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£67.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £67.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
218
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.04/FPS
30%
Price, £
£225.84
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for £225.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |