Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 266 days newer than Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G6900 - 156 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for £200.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
60.15009380863039%
Multi-Core
2696
18.157327586206897%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |